The late lambing optimum profile shown in Figure 1. takes into account both profitability and the health of the breeding flock.
Ewe mortality generally increases with lower ewe condition by lambing (there are other factors such as weather, age and available feed). Ewe condition in late pregnancy has a large impact on lamb birth weight and therefore lamb survival. There is a compensatory gain effect on lamb birthweight when ewes that have lost condition regain it in late pregnancy. Twin lambs are more sensitive to this change in birth weight (& survival) as their birthweightis usually further from the optimum.
Table 1 shows the effect of several profiles on both lamb and ewe survival.
Following a profile that loses more condition over autumn (0.6 CS) and only re-gains half of it by lambing has similar profitability to that of the optimum profile, however, there are large penalties in ewe and lamb survival. Ewe mortality doubles and the survival of twin lambs is 10% lower than the optimum (67% compared to 77%). It is also a high risk option in that if the season fails to break and ewes don't regain that small amount the lambing results could be disastrous, with 14% lower twin survival and further ewe losses.
Table 1. Difference in survival of ewes and lambs for late lambingflocks compared to maintaining condition score 3.0 throughout pregnancy
Condition score
|
Survival %
|
joining
|
Day 90
|
lambing
|
singles
|
twins
|
Ewes
|
2.6
|
2.3
|
2.6
|
-2.6
|
-0.6
|
-0.5
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
2.3
|
-5.2
|
-5.9
|
-1.4
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
-9.4
|
-14.2
|
-2.6
|
3.0
|
2.7
|
3.0
|
1.0
|
6.3
|
0.1
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Running stock to a higher profile such as starting in CS 3 at joining and losing 0.3 by the break and re-gaining all lost condition by lambing has a slightly lower profitability (-$2.30/ewe) but if there is a more severe climate or irregular seasons this may be the best option. This profile gives an increase in lamb and ewe survival compared to maintaining at condition score 3 throughout pregnancy but there are small costs associated with having the ewes in a higher condition at joining.
The Condition Score profile is for the average of the flock. Usually in each flock there will be some individuals at least 0.5 of a condition score lower (and an equal proportion that are 0.5 of a condition score higher). Individual ewes should not be below CS 2. Ewes at or below CS 2 during pregnancy should have preferential treatment to regain condition prior to lambing as ewe (as well as lamb) mortality increases dramatically when ewes are below CS 2.
If the regain in condition by lambing isn't made and the ewes continue to lose condition in late pregnancy to near CS 2, large penalties from ewe and lamb mortality will be incurred. Even maintaining condition in late pregnancy after losing condition in early pregnancy will have an impact on lamb survival, particularly with twin lambs. Any individuals in the mob at or below CS2 will be at higher risk.
Running lower Stocking Rates
These profiles are also suitable for flocks run at stocking rates lower than the optimum. However, following the lifetimewool ewe profile can allow you to increase stocking rates safely and thereby increasing profitabilty.
In years that ewes' peak condition prior to joining is above the optimum, it is worthwhile following the higher profile as described in Figure 1 (ie. joining in CS 3, losing to CS 2.7 and regaining to CS 3 by lambing) for that season because extra productivity will result.
Continuing to run ewes at this higher flock condition score will give a slightly lower profitability to runninng ewes at the optimum profile, as the most of higher cost of supplementation is offset by the higher production gains. Aiming to be on this profile every year or in an average year will be more expensive as it takes more supplement to grow maiden ewes to the higher starting condition score.
For more information on lifetimewool please contact
Dr Ralph Behrendt, DPI Hamilton Ralph.Behrendt@dpi.vic.gov.au